When Evo Morales came to office in 2006, he cut the presidential salary in half and passed a law prohibiting public officials from earning any more than he did. Against a historical background of elected officials lining their pockets with funds from the public treasury, the move appeared reasonable, perhaps even noble. Assuming the salary is at least sufficient to meet basic needs, a cap of this sort may serve as a way to screen out opportunists and ensure that those seeking employment with the government are doing so out of a genuine desire to serve the public.
Of course, Evo has tons of perks that ordinary government workers don’t have. So while the salary is more than enough to support the President’s needs, it often fails to satisfy for those not living in the Presidential Palace. To make up the difference, public workers, especially university professors, have picked up other jobs. So far so good. If the jobs are within the private sector, there is no issue. But if the second job is also a public job–say, a medical professor who works in a public hospital or a law professor who moonlights as a judge–things get tricky. According to the government’s interpretation, the law demands that the salaries of these two public jobs be combined. If the sum exceeds the President’s draw, the individual is in violation.
With this in mind, Cochabamba’s main public university, Universidad Mayor de San Simon (UMSS), fears it may lose half of its professors. To avoid the limitations of the financial law, so the theory goes, these professors would seek employment with private universities. With some 60,000 students enrolled at UMSS, this would be a serious blow to public education in Cochabamba. Presumably a similar dynamic would occur in Bolivia’s other public universities.
I’m not sure how I come down on all this, but I definitely think it merits some serious thought. Any initial reactions?








